Spectator February
25, 1905
(Partial)
History
repeats itself almost every day in Hamilton. In looking over an old copy of the
Spectator, we find that 51 years ago tonight, the City Council held a meeting
to fix salaries of city officials for the year 1854. As this question of salaries is now before the
council and Ald. Witton is preparing a scale for the current year, it may be
interesting to the present generation of Hamiltonians to know how small the
emolument of city officers were half a century ago. The council was then
composed of aldermen and councilors, and all but three or four have crossed the
river of death. Robert McElroy was mayor, having been elected for a third term.
The aldermen were Patterson, Mullin, Mitchell, Murison, Davis, Chisholm, William
Edgar, Magill and Crawford; councilors, Armstrong, Copp, Nicholson, Quimby,
Tuckett, Fitzpatrick, Matthews and Charlton. On motion of Councillor, Copp,
seconded by Ald. Edgar, the salary list for 1854 was passed, as follows:
Chamberlain $1,000
Clerk, for do 450
City Clerk
1,000
Clerk, for do 300
Police Magistrate
1,000
Manager for Waterworks 1,000
Clerk for Waterworks
300
Collector for Waterworks
200
High Bailiff, with house, fuel,
etc. 400
Chief of police, with house, fuel,
etc.
500
Deputy chief, with free house
350
Six policemen, each $200 $1,200
Machinist
100
Inspector of Weights and Measures 50
License Inspector 400
City Messenger
250
Hospital Physician 400
Hospital Superintendent 250
Hospital Matron
90
House of Refuge Superintendent 200
Foreman Waterworks 400
Engineer Waterworks
250
Fireman Waterworks
250
Keeper of Reservoir 200
Keeper
of Filtering Basin
200
Keeper of Prisoners at jail
250
It was very evident that the council
of 1854 was living up to the precepts of an old-time Methodist congregation
that did not believe in making their pastor purse-proud by giving him too much
salary, so the official board fervently prayed that the Lord would keep him
humble and the congregation would keep him poor. Probably one reason may be
given for the small amounts voted to some of the officials was that at the time
the city exchequer was in a very low condition, and the creditors of the city
were clamoring for their money. At that time, there was what was known as the
Municipal Loan Fund, from which municipalities in financial difficulties could
borrow money from the government to help them pull through. Sir Issac Buchanan,
who then represented Hamilton in the provincial parliament, made application,
on behalf of the city, for a loan from this fund, and he was told by Sandfield
McDonald that there was no such fund; yet, George Brown, editor of the Globe,
secured a gift of $13,000, to help pay the cost of building the Toronto jail.
The Globe was always hostile to Hamilton.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A story is told by one of the largest
grain buyers in Hamilton, which happened early in the 50s. He prided himself on
his smartness, and when he got the worst of it in a grain transaction, the
other buyers made considerable sport of him. The grain buyer got stuck on 200
bushels of barley by a cute farmer, who had one bag of splendid grain, which he
showed as a sample, but when the buyer examined the lot after it was dumped in
the warehouse bins he discovered that he had been duped by the farmer. However,
he determined to quietly pocket his loss and sold the damaged barley in one of
the city brewing establishments at a low figure. When the brewer examined the
barley, after it had been delivered at the brewery, he concluded he could do
better with it by converting it into malt, and he had it dried and fixed up for
market. The brewer hired a farmer to haul the barley to the Gore, which was
then the grain market, and as barley was scarce in the market and there was a
good demand for it, there was brisk competition among the buyers. The buyer who
sold it to the brewer bid the highest, and he got back his own barley at 34
cents a bushel, twice the sum for which he had sold it to the brewer. The joke
was too good to keep and the brewer and the other buyers had the laugh on John.
For years afterward John would get swearing mad at anyone who would ask him,
“how is barley?”
No comments:
Post a Comment